Sunday Times Teaser 3279 – It’s a Doddle!
by Stephen Hogg
Published Sunday July 27 2025 (link)
The Holmes’s new maths tutor, Dr Moriarty, wrote several two-figure by three-figure whole number multiplications on the board (with no answer repeated). Young Sherlock whispered to his brother, “That first one’s a doddle and the three-figure number is prime.” Mycroft replied, “Yes, it is a doddle, but the answer is also a DODDLE.” Sherlock looked puzzled. Mycroft explained that a DODDLE is a number with “Descending-Order Digits left to right — all different — DivisibLe Exactly by each digit.” Mycroft continued, “All of the above applies to the second multiplication as well.”
Sherlock noticed that just one other answer, to the final problem, was a DODDLE, with the three-figure value being odd, but not prime.
What is the answer to the final problem?
Here is an alternative (faster) version:
“just one other answer, to the final problem, was a DODDLE”.
It seems that we have different interpretations of this line. I regard “other answer” as an answer on the board and not a theoretically possible answer.
My interpretation of the phrase you quote is as follows:
If we create the set of all DODDLEs derived from all 3-digit primes \(\{P\}\) (with \(|\{P\}|\ge 2\)) and the set of all DODDLEs derived from all odd 3-digit non-primes \(\{O\}\), I interpret the phrase you quote to imply that \(|\{O\}\; -\; \{P\}| == 1\).
I agree that \(\{O\}\; -\; \{P\}\) is on the board.